• projects
  • the lab
  • news
    • bio
    • collaborators
    • connect
    • cv
Menu

tia kramer

  • projects
  • the lab
  • news
  • about
    • bio
    • collaborators
    • connect
    • cv
TKramer_BYAH_searching_web.jpg

Guided by concerns

December 2, 2018

Excerpted from the final Because You Are Here (BYAH) performance script
Written by Donovan Olsen and the cast of BYAH (with alterations for this context by Tia Kramer)


Context: The Because You Are Here performance arose from a class which aimed to act as a collective response to the here and now. At the same time that we, the class, committed to collaboration, risk-taking, civic responsibility, and co-authorship of a socially engaged theater piece, we remained conscious of the ever-changing political landscape that surrounds us. While we are artists and students, we were seen as whole people and asked to bring forth our knowledge and experiences as such.

Six weeks ago, we gathered as a group to list our concerns regarding this project. They were numerous and nuanced and each concern we listed seem to spawn new and valuable considerations. Considerations that we vowed, as individuals comprising a larger collective, to bear in mind through the rest of our creative process in preparation for this show.

We worried that we would misrepresent voices. That we would let context go by the wayside. That the performance you are seeing here tonight would overshadow the process that has led us here. We worried that our focus on audience criticism might get in the way of our ability to take action. We questioned how best to honor the ten people we interviewed. And how to leave space for the millions of stories we are not telling here tonight—including the stories of at least eight people who wanted to be interviewed for this project but, for various reasons have not yet been—each with their own complexities and urgency and need to be heard.

TKramer_BYAH4_web.jpg

We asked whether we were giving ourselves over with the same vulnerability we asked of the people we interviewed. As we raised this concern, Walla Walla resident Afrika Brown shared with us the following wisdom, informed by the work and writing of James Baldwin. She said,

“To stand and say that you will be the witness to another’s story makes you vulnerable because you are being trusted to tell a person’s story. You now bear some of the responsibility of the story. But in that place of vulnerability there is power because you can ensure that the story is not forgotten.”

How would we make this project into something that could endure?

TKramer_BYAH_SocialPractice_web.jpg

The image above lists the values we wanted to prioritize in the making of this work.

Below are some of the questions and concerns we raised that November day. We decided to use these as guides. In this way, our concerns marked a path for our creative progress INSTEAD of becoming hurdles that might stop or prohibit action.

  • How do we emphasize that this show and process is relational?

  • Will it be accessible? And to who?

  • Can we create a performance that is for the interviewees AND the privileged Whitman community AND the HISPANIC/LATINX community? Is that impossible?

  • What if we don’t satisfy our interviewees?

  • What if we misrepresent voices?

  • How can we honor all the people who want to be interviewed by have not been interviewed?

  • Will we be able to illuminate the the struggles of the immigrants we interviewed while also sharing their strength, value and importance in our community?

  • How do we include collaborators in the final stages of the process without creating arbitrary pressure on the creative work or the collaborators themselves?

  • What if we won’t/can’t adequately maintain relationships with interviewees?

  • Have we, the artists, recognized our own vulnerabilities ENOUGH? Have we made ourselves vulnerable enough?

  • What role should language translation/interpretation play in this project?

  • What if we translate too much of our content into English? What if we translate too little of it?

  • How can this show benefit the COMMUNITY and not just those of us who are creating it and Whitman College as in institution?

  • Which collaborators have we not fully engaged? If wrong doing was done can it be mended?

  • How do we cope with the fact that we can not produce a show on this topic that is somewhat ethically problematic? Can we be ok with that imperfection and still proceed?

  • If we don’t do this work, who will?

  • What if we allow context will go by the wayside?

  • How might our own bias’ and blinders (those we have because of our privilege and context) create a problematic framework for this show?

  • What are the consequences of our our actions? Do they impact our egos or the people we have interviewed more?

  • Can we do no harm?

  • Who is the target audience? Who is OUR target audience? Who are the interviewees’ target audience?

  • What format or form does the play need to meet the requirements of Harper Joy Theatre? What are the limitations of HJT? Can these be addressed?

  • How can/could we bring in partnerships beyond those we have already engaged?

  • How can we expand the audience, the people who are actually in the room, beyond the typical Whitman Harper Joy Theatre audience? Can we get people to the theatre who do not normally come to the theatre?

  • If we put effort into expanding our audience and making the show accessible, should we continue that effort for other shows and shouldn’t that impulse go beyond that effort.

  • What if we don’t have the time to expand our audience and the accessibility of the show? If we won’t do the work to actually be effective, will it happen?

  • What are the barriers that might prevent Whitman campus to see the show?

  • Is childcare a barrier for our intended audience? How can we provide child care for the show?

  • Is language a barrier for our intended audience? If we provide Spanish translation for the show will it be utilized?

  • What if we cater to an audience that does not know Spanish while advertising to an audience that has to get by on a language they don’t feel comfortable with?

  • What if there is unexpected backlash to the show? What if that backlash hurts our co-creators and/or the people we are trying to share the stage with?

  • What if we over emphasize the performance and not the process?

  • What if work gets critiqued as an end product rather than a process? What if the perception of of the show by “others” is over emphasized?

  • What if audience members are so bent on critiquing this that they won’t receive it? It is easier to critique than to receive?

  • Can we guide and help the audience to be generous?

  • How can we avoid getting stuck in our heads?

  • How do we create a project that endures beyond the show itself?


MORE: RESEARCH (from THE LAB)
or find posts from all categories of THE LAB below.

 
In Research Tags Research, Because You Are Here, Hear Here Walla Walla
May this practice be of benefit →
Featured
Guided by concerns
Dec 2, 2018
Research
Guided by concerns
Dec 2, 2018
Research
Dec 2, 2018
Research
May this practice be of benefit
Nov 15, 2018
Actions
May this practice be of benefit
Nov 15, 2018
Actions
Nov 15, 2018
Actions
The Red Square
Oct 30, 2018
Actions
The Red Square
Oct 30, 2018
Actions
Oct 30, 2018
Actions
Magic in the mundane?
Apr 22, 2018
Actions
Magic in the mundane?
Apr 22, 2018
Actions
Apr 22, 2018
Actions
What's your problem?
Mar 11, 2018
Research
What's your problem?
Mar 11, 2018
Research
Mar 11, 2018
Research
Sigh.  Observe whether anyone noticed. Repeat. (COSMOS 1536)
Jan 31, 2018
Actions
Sigh. Observe whether anyone noticed. Repeat. (COSMOS 1536)
Jan 31, 2018
Actions
Jan 31, 2018
Actions
Follow behind someone you don’t know
Jan 22, 2018
Tests
Follow behind someone you don’t know
Jan 22, 2018
Tests
Jan 22, 2018
Tests
Social Works
Dec 7, 2017
Research
Social Works
Dec 7, 2017
Research
Dec 7, 2017
Research
Who do we choose to let in?
Nov 28, 2017
Tests
Who do we choose to let in?
Nov 28, 2017
Tests
Nov 28, 2017
Tests
How do we 'respect'?
Oct 13, 2017
Research
How do we 'respect'?
Oct 13, 2017
Research
Oct 13, 2017
Research
Rest
Jul 30, 2017
Actions
Rest
Jul 30, 2017
Actions
Jul 30, 2017
Actions
12 (suggested) Acts
May 21, 2017
Actions
12 (suggested) Acts
May 21, 2017
Actions
May 21, 2017
Actions
A tour at the pace of my 1.5 year old
Jan 9, 2017
Tests
A tour at the pace of my 1.5 year old
Jan 9, 2017
Tests
Jan 9, 2017
Tests
Operation: GRASP
May 1, 2016
Actions
Operation: GRASP
May 1, 2016
Actions
May 1, 2016
Actions
Time out for happiness
Jul 30, 2015
Research
Time out for happiness
Jul 30, 2015
Research
Jul 30, 2015
Research
18 types of elemental motion
Feb 26, 2015
Research
18 types of elemental motion
Feb 26, 2015
Research
Feb 26, 2015
Research
A response to my sketch: between
Sep 12, 2014
Tests
A response to my sketch: between
Sep 12, 2014
Tests
Sep 12, 2014
Tests
Silent structures: A performance score
Aug 24, 2014
Actions
Silent structures: A performance score
Aug 24, 2014
Actions
Aug 24, 2014
Actions
Short Talk on Housing
Jul 8, 2014
Research
Short Talk on Housing
Jul 8, 2014
Research
Jul 8, 2014
Research
What is (porous)?
May 1, 2014
Tests
What is (porous)?
May 1, 2014
Tests
May 1, 2014
Tests
Between
May 1, 2014
Tests
Between
May 1, 2014
Tests
May 1, 2014
Tests
On the creative practice and making
May 1, 2014
Research
On the creative practice and making
May 1, 2014
Research
May 1, 2014
Research
Quietest Place?
Apr 15, 2014
Research
Quietest Place?
Apr 15, 2014
Research
Apr 15, 2014
Research
Apr 14, 2014
Research
Horizon: Intimate distance
Apr 14, 2014
Research
Apr 14, 2014
Research